Abbildung ggf. abweichend | Note: 3,0 "befriedigend" guenstiger.de-Note |
| Fremdsprachige Tests | ||
![]() | ![]() Testurteil: "befriedigend" ⇔ Original: "4 out of 6 stars" | |
| Shop | Produkt-Information ![]() | Versand | Preis ![]() |
|---|
| Jetzt bewerten | Intel PRO/1000 MT LanAdapter PCI-X 64bit C368 | sofort ab Lager | 39,95* 27.05.2012 | Zum Shop |
| Details & Infos | Intel Pro1000MT 1GBit RJ45 ServerNIC BLK | 24 Stunden | 79,99* 27.05.2012 | Zum Shop |
(152) | Intel Pro1000MT 1GBit RJ45 ServerNIC BLK | 2 bis 3 Tagen | 104,45* 27.05.2012 | Zum Shop |
(5348) | Intel GmbH Pro1000MT 1GBit RJ45 ServerNIC BLK | Lieferbar in 2-5 Werktagen | 105,17* 27.05.2012 | Zum Shop |
(3134) | Intel PRO/1000MT Server (PWLA8490MTBLK) | Artikel sofort lieferbar | 105,70* 27.05.2012 | Zum Shop |
(606) | Intel Pro/1000MT Server PCI BULK | 3-5 Werktage | 106,62* 27.05.2012 | Zum Shop |
(1688) | Intel Pro/1000 MT Server Adapter | sofort lieferbar | 107,49* 27.05.2012 | Zum Shop |
(7) | Intel Pro/1000 MT Server Adapter | sofort lieferbar | 107,86* 27.05.2012 | Zum Shop |
(7) | Intel Pro/1000 MT Server Adapter PWLA8490MTBL | sofort lieferbar | 108,41* 27.05.2012 | Zum Shop |
ab 104,64 guenstiger.de-Note: 2,7 "befriedigend" | |
c't / Ausgabe 16/2010 Zitat: "Engagierte Gamer, die jede Millisekunde Reaktionszeit herausholen und dabei nicht auf paralleles Datenkopieren verzichten wollen, können zu Killer 2100 greifen, denn sie leistet für diesen Spezialfall das, was der Hersteller verspricht. Doch alle anderen investieren lieber in ein Programm wie beispielsweise S.A.D.s Online-Gaming Booster,..." | |
zockon.de / Ausgabe 7/2011 Urteil:84% Zitat: "Bronze-Award
Pro: + Hochwertige Verarbeitung
+ Spitzen Optik... + ...mit roten LEDs + Gute Latenz trotz Download + Komfortable und umfangreiche Software Kontra: - Karte sonst mit nur geringem Vorteil gegenüber der Onboard-Lösung Netzwerkkarte für Profis" | |
Gamezoom.net / Ausgabe 9/2010 Urteil:8 von 10 Punkten Zitat: "Pro: hochwertige Verarbeitung
+ Verbesserungen bei Pings, Latenzen und FPS + umfangreiche Software; zahlreiche Optionen und Einstellungsmöglichkeiten + geringe Leistungsaufnahme Contra: Preis - nur ein Port - nach wie vor nur etwas für Enthusiasten Die neue Killer 2100 Netzwerkkarte konnte uns überzeugen. Vor allem Enthusiasten, die weniger auf ihren Kontostand achten müssen, dürfen sich über niedrigere Latenzen und (im Idealfall) über eine bessere Spiele-Leistung freuen. Highlight ist und bleibt aber das umfangreiche sowie leicht zu konfigurierende „Network Manager" Tool. Hier hat Bigfoot Networks ganze Arbeit geleistet. Christoph meint: Eine leistungsstarke Netzwerkkarte für Zocker!" | |
reghardware.co.uk / Ausgabe 6/2010 Urteil:80% Zitat: "The Bigfoot Networks Killer 2100 does not work miracles and being priced at around £100 it is only a wise purchase for serious gamers who will appreciate noticeable in-game smoothness. Maybe it´s not the first piece of kit to spend your money on when building a gaming PC, however, you w..." | |
techradar.com / Ausgabe 7/2010 Urteil:2 out of 5 stars Zitat: "For: + Improves ping rates
+ Smoother framerates Against: - Improvements are tiny - Still too exp..." | |
bit-tech.net / Ausgabe 9/2010 Urteil:5/10 Zitat: "It says a lot that it was so difficult for us to see any tangible difference from the Killer 2100 despite our best efforts to test in a scientific and consistent way. Even in our theoretical tests where we could control the variables of our local, private network we saw little benefit from the Killer 2100. When gaming we saw little difference between our (free) on-board network controller and the Killer 2100 in terms of ping and frame rate. The only advantage we found was that the Killer 2100 allowed us to download in the background while gaming - possibly handy if you buy loads of games via download services but haven´t the patience to wait for those downloads. This makes it very difficult to recommend the Killer 2100 as, at the end of the day, everyone wants some kind of tangible benefit for their £68. For the gamer who has everything, the Killer 2100 could be a consideration, as we did see very slight ping improvements in CoD 4 and CSS, after all. Having said that, you might see better improvements in online gaming..." | |
gamingnexus.com / Ausgabe 8/2011 Urteil:C+ Zitat: "At $89, it´s still a little bit too high, in my opinion, to recommend over other components to upgrade as it´s really hard to see the tangible improvements with the Killer 2100. The software´s really cool though and there are a few tests where I saw little improvement over my internal NIC..." | |
overclockersclub.com / Ausgabe 3/2011 Urteil:Silver Award Zitat: "Pros: + Card offloads network communication from system
+ Increased network performance, especially for UDP traffic + Plug and play hardware + Application-level prioritization and control + The ability to turn off the onboard red LED + Real-time network and system monitoring + Integration with Fraps for FPS contro After running the Bigfoot Networks Killer 2100 through the ringer, I have a fond respect for what it does. The claim is that it offers lower pings and higher FPS in games using UDP packet styles, which are the vast majority of online games out there that connect to the Internet for play. UDP is a connection-less protocol that spams packets onto the wire without first establishing a session or using a delivery confirmation method like TCP does. With the nature of UDP, if a packet gets lost it is not retransmitted, which if enough packets are dropped, then you start to notice a real interruption in your games. The Killer 2100 is designed to give your UDP packets first priority to the wire to help lessen the probability of dropped game packets. After seeing the tests, the combination of the hardware and the Killer Network Manager provided UDP transfers that were faster than both the onboard and Netgear discrete NICs. The Killer Network Manager is one of the key components that make the Killer 2100 as good as it is. The software allows you to control the priority of packets from applications using your system´s network resources, as well as the ability to control how much bandwidth each one is allowed to use. As an example, when I was running the tests with the Bittorrent application, I was able to throttle down the upload and download speeds to a maximum of 1Mbps, keeping it from using a lot of my bandwidth. This gave my game the ability to squeeze a few more packets onto the wire faster, which could mean the difference between my bullet killing my opponent or his killing me first. While this card will not double your network speed, if you are hardcore into gaming and every second counts, then you will benefit from the abilities of the Killer..." | |
bootdaily.com / Ausgabe 5/2010 Urteil:10/10 Zitat: "Boot Worthy
..." | |
bit-tech.net / Ausgabe 5/2010 Urteil:5/10 Zitat: "We were fans of the original Killer NIC but its lustre has worn off – there isn´t a notable performance difference between it and generic on-board NICs this time, thanks to improvements in Windows. This is obviously a problem, as the two network controllers we tested the Xeno Pro against have more tangible benefits – the wireless card gives us a neater house, and the on-board NIC was free with our motherboard. Even the hardware firewall and QoS features of the Xeno Pro are largely pointless, as these are now usually built into your router, and this will serve all the PCs in your home rather than just one PC. The Xeno Pro is only ..." | |
