OCZ Vertex 3 SATA III 2.5" SSD 120GB

Zitat: Transferrate: 94 Zugriffszeit: 22 Praxistest: 95 Leistungsaufnahme: 39

Zitat: + Gute Leistungswerte + Lange MTBF-Zeit - Etwas hohe Leistungsaufnahme

Zitat: award Pro: + Available in 60GB, 120GB and 240GB capacities + Excellent sequential read and write speeds + SATA 6Gb/s interface + Synchronous NAND flash + Supports TRIM, SMART and NCQ + Includes a 2.5" to 3.5" adapter bracket + 3 year warranty + 60GB and 120GB versions are reasonably priced Contra: - Not as fast when writing incompressible data - 240GB version is still pricey OCZ´s 120GB Vertex 3 is an excellent choice for anyone looking to put a high-performance SSD in their desktop or laptop. Thanks to its SandForce SF-2281 controller and SATA 6Gb/s interface, the drive performed very well in our sequential read and write tests, reading at speeds as high as 558 MB/s and writing at speeds in excess of 460 MB/s. The Vertex 3 also took the top spot in our random write tests, delivering more than 66,000 IOPS. As with other SandForce drives, the Vertex 3´s performance did take a hit when reading and writing incompressible data. However, with its synchronous NAND flash, it was still faster than its sibling, the Agility 3. The price of the 120GB Vertex 3 has come down considerably since it was introduced. It currently goes for $200 on Amazon.com , which is only $35 more than the Agility 3 . With a price gap this small, the 120GB Vertex 3 is definitely the better bang for your buck. The price of the 240GB Vertex 3 has also come down some over the last few months. However, with prices starting at $460 , it is still at least $100 more than the 240GB Agility 3. This may push more budget conscious consumers towards the Agility 3, but if you have the room in your computer, a pair of 120GB Vertex 3´s would probably be a better choice.

Zitat: Pro: + Wysoka wydajność Niewygórowana cena w stosunku do możliwości SATA 6 Gb/s Wady W testach rzeczywistych wypada gorzej niż w testach syntetycznych Znane problemy ze stabilnością Contra: - W testach rzeczywistych wypada gorzej niż w testach syntetycznych Znane problemy ze stabilnością